PUBLISHING TRANSPARENCY

STR Energy editorial standards

We explain who prepares our energy-market and industrial energy-management content, which sources support it, and how we correct errors.

Last reviewed: 2 September 2026

Useful to people

We do not publish a page merely to attract search traffic. Every guide must help an energy professional understand a concept, interpret data correctly, or build a better decision checklist.

Primary sources first

For market, regulatory and technical subjects we prefer official or standards bodies such as EPİAŞ, EPDK, TEİAŞ, ENTSO-E, EIA, the European Commission, ISO, IEC, NIST and CISA. Article sources are listed at the end.

State the limits

We disclose live-data delays, revisions, unit differences and time-zone issues. Content is educational and does not replace investment, legal or binding engineering advice.

Correctable publishing

When we find a material error, broken source or outdated statement, we update the page and keep the review date visible. Corrections can be sent to support@str-energy.com.

How a guide is prepared

  1. 1

    Define the real user question and the decision the content should support.

  2. 2

    Select primary sources and compare definitions, units, scope and date conditions.

  3. 3

    Structure the guide around practical steps, calculation boundaries and common mistakes—not a generic summary.

  4. 4

    Check the title, dates, source links, limitations and relevant internal links before publication.

  5. 5

    Revisit changing regulations and data sources on a periodic review cycle.

Technology-assisted work

Software-assisted tools may support research organisation, language review or translation. They are not treated as sources. Source selection, scope and publication accountability remain with the STR Energy Editorial Team; unverified automated output is not a basis for publication.

Authorship and accountability

Technical guides on this site are institutionally authored by the STR Energy Editorial Team. Unless an individual qualification or field result can be accurately substantiated, we use an organisational byline rather than imply personal expertise.